
About thehangingchad.com
It is absolutely amazing to me that in this day and age, an
election can come down to a tiny chad of paper hanging from a ballot. It
gets even worse when we consider trying determine the intent of the voter
from a pregnant
chad.
Yet, that is exactly where we are.
The legal system, which was never meant to
intercede, has now been injected into the electoral process. I'm not aware
of a provision in
our Constitution that allows a judge (one single man or woman) the right to
determine the outcome of a presidential election. This is a most
disturbingly ironic "one man, one vote" scenario.
I don't believe the majority of the American people
understand that this is a fundamental breach of their Constitutional
rights.
Liberals rush to embrace and create revisionist
history wherein the truth simply does not count.
Their "spin doctors" craft elaborate
explanations. We are told what really happened, is not what happened at
all and that what we heard meant something other than what it sounded
like. No matter how it sounds or appears, the liberal candidate's
intention are good, unlike intent of their "mean spirited" opponents.
When Plan A fails, they quickly move to Plan B. A classic example is
the Democratic party's patent endorsement of abortion, a convenient, expedient revision of the
real facts. Someone or something else is always at fault.
Liberals are always willing to compromise the truth in
order to build or maintain power and their voter base.
thehangingchad.com was conceived as a forum to
balance this compromise. Please send stories that point out the sharp
contrast . And, please send your
opinions.
In keeping with the conservative view that there is no
such thing as a free lunch, We Need
Sponsors.
Copyright 2000, TheHangingChad.com™
TheHangingChad.com
P.O. Box 5126
Akron, OH 44334-0126
|